Abstract
The ability of EUS to diagnose small pancreatic cancer is well known. In this study,
we present our experience with EUS in the local staging of 29 patients with pancreatic
carcinoma who underwent surgery. EUS was 79, 83 and 79 % accurate in determining anterior
(including gastric), duodenal and retroperitoneal (vascular) invasion by the tumor.
Ultrasonography (48, 39 and 55 %, respectively) and CT (38, 33 and 41 %, respectively)
were less reliable. EUS was equal to angiography in diagnosing vascular involvement.
EUS was more effective in detecting splenoportal infiltration (sensitivity 88 %, specificity
78 %) than arterial involvement (accuracy 50 %). EUS was also less reliable in determining
the N stage (66 %) and in stage grouping (72 %). Although EUS is superior to ultrasonography
and CT in the local staging of pancreatic carcinoma, further studies must show whether
improved staging criteria will lead to better results.